<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:coop="http://www.google.com/coop/namespace"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family Tree Maker 2008 Review: Newer Isn&#8217;t Always Better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/</link>
	<description>Our most treasured family heirlooms are our sweet family memories. --Unknown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:53:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
<meta xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex,follow" />
	<item>
		<title>By: webduck</title>
		<link>http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>webduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Marty, what was the file extension type? As far as I know, both 2008 and FTM 16 should support PDF and RTF files. If they saved it as a Word file (DOC) then I don&#039;t think it would open in FTM no matter what version. Was it a GEDCOM file? GEDCOM&#039;s are the most common file type for sharing genealogical information, even between different genealogy programs that are NOT Family Tree Maker. 

Does anyone have a better answer?

&lt;em&gt;webduck&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipentimento/yiNU/~3/261619192/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iPentimento Will Be Featured Tomorrow&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marty, what was the file extension type? As far as I know, both 2008 and FTM 16 should support PDF and RTF files. If they saved it as a Word file (DOC) then I don&#8217;t think it would open in FTM no matter what version. Was it a GEDCOM file? GEDCOM&#8217;s are the most common file type for sharing genealogical information, even between different genealogy programs that are NOT Family Tree Maker. </p>
<p>Does anyone have a better answer?</p>
<p><em>webduck&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ipentimento/yiNU/~3/261619192/'>iPentimento Will Be Featured Tomorrow</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 23:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/#comment-431</guid>
		<description>A relative with FTM 2008 tried to send me a disc of info -- the file appears with the FTM icon and the property &quot;FTM Family File&quot;.  When I try to open this on my  FTM Version 16, I get the message &quot;Family Tree Maker does not recognize the format of the file you are trying to open.&quot;  Do files saved from FTM 2008 not open with older versions of FTM???  Should I have my relative try to save it to disc in a different way???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A relative with FTM 2008 tried to send me a disc of info &#8212; the file appears with the FTM icon and the property &#8220;FTM Family File&#8221;.  When I try to open this on my  FTM Version 16, I get the message &#8220;Family Tree Maker does not recognize the format of the file you are trying to open.&#8221;  Do files saved from FTM 2008 not open with older versions of FTM???  Should I have my relative try to save it to disc in a different way???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webduck</title>
		<link>http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>webduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Looks like the votes are running more against the FTM08 version than I thought. Thanks to everyone who left a comment and opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the votes are running more against the FTM08 version than I thought. Thanks to everyone who left a comment and opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/#comment-420</guid>
		<description>I have owned every version of FamilyTreemaker, and was always anxious for the next release. NEVER have I been so disappointed. For those of you who believe that it will work better with Vista, quit worrying, as I have all of the same problem XP users are battling.

I kept thinking I would give it a chance and learn the new version, but truly, my interest is continuing my famly research, not trying to debug new software.

You are right, &quot;Newer is not always better&quot;. What a shame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have owned every version of FamilyTreemaker, and was always anxious for the next release. NEVER have I been so disappointed. For those of you who believe that it will work better with Vista, quit worrying, as I have all of the same problem XP users are battling.</p>
<p>I kept thinking I would give it a chance and learn the new version, but truly, my interest is continuing my famly research, not trying to debug new software.</p>
<p>You are right, &#8220;Newer is not always better&#8221;. What a shame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddy</title>
		<link>http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipentimento.com/family-tree-maker-2008-review-newer-isnt-always-better/#comment-411</guid>
		<description>I started using FTM 2008 in XP and something was probaby wrong since every click took literally minutes. I had asked for support to Ancestry.com and never got an answer. Then I changed my computer that came with Vista and things started to work slightly better as long as I just navegate the program, but when I make some editions it almost freezes (cpu shows 98% busy for many minutes). So I&#039;m seriously thinking to go back to FTM 2006 which never gave me any problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started using FTM 2008 in XP and something was probaby wrong since every click took literally minutes. I had asked for support to Ancestry.com and never got an answer. Then I changed my computer that came with Vista and things started to work slightly better as long as I just navegate the program, but when I make some editions it almost freezes (cpu shows 98% busy for many minutes). So I&#8217;m seriously thinking to go back to FTM 2006 which never gave me any problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
